зона поражения??? « Играй в S.T.A.L.K.E.R….
зона поражения??? « Играй в S.T.A.L.K.E.R. …]]>
I have said it a million times, ubuntu people MUST upgrade the OME versions to hget the best of it.
the GPU/MultiCore accelerated Image/Video processing and display Library thingui,I thinks is NOT primary here, OME has got further than any other NLE, for now the usabilty shoud be number OME, you know, save/load node presets, import/export projects from cinelerra or blender sequencer, because the linux apps works as ISLANDS, we need WORKFLOW, just like in apple you can pre edit in imovie, and then export to finalcut, CINELERRA has a cool power features that the editor could use, but it lacks th usability of OME, you could EXPORT TO CINELERRA to use animated masks and effects, this until OME could have tose improvements, but NOW we need a COMPLETE workflow.
more and better editing/cut clips to automate edits, OME should focus in cut EDITOR´s time, not MACHINE times, because I can put my pc to render the whole night but I can´t expect to be editing the double or triple my regular editing time, that happends in cinelerra, in my pc it´s faster, but I SPEND LESS TIME WORKING in front of the computer, so MY TIME is MORE important than the computer´s.
-the high performance, high quality intermediate codec, IS A MUST, but if we could BRIDGE the many apps as I have explained before, we could have the best of many apps, capture in KINO, load and ORGANIZE the material in cinelerra, export to OME the xml project, edit the project in OME, then call cinelerra for rendering or expor to CINELERRA to add more effects and use the interlacing options in cinelerra. the problem with the intermediate codec, is TIME LOST for the editor, because we should tend to eliminate RENDERTIMES and CONVERSIONS, and that can be done in 1 way, SEQUENCING, so you import edit, reuse timelines, and when you render for the first time, that is the FINAL RENDER, when ou expect to loss quelity to mpeg/dvd for instance. Adobe and Canopus had proven this point with the sequencing, and Bleder sequencer has sequences, they call them METACLIPS, and helps a LOT, in that way a intermediate codec is unnesessary for editing, will be used to archive.
DVDstyler If i may disagree think is the worst thing I have ever saw to author DVD, I think OME should have a EXPORT TO DVD and make XML readyfiles for MANDVD, or TOVID which is fast and easy to use to the average joe, or even have the xml/dvdstyler exporter, so OME could make a render in mpegs with markers, and the external app simply load a project cutted and rendered with effects.
OME internally should have a commandline call to make the dvd and burn after render, to make DVDs without menues, simply markers, and make LOOP DVD videos.
If you pull the GVFX thingui we talk about, the same system could be used to simply load templates and make a dvd from commandlines with no much change to OME.
I think OME is great, but if you think about these points you will find that MANY THINGS CAN BE DONE EXTERNALLY with minor changes to OME, don´t try to make and app that makes the SAME as other apps, If I could suggest something, FOCUS IN A COMPLETE WORKFLOW, there are many cool tools in linux but the coders are too focused in try to get the best app of the world but in my opinion, that´s wasting time until we can get something to edit in linux that be 100% ready… OME as I have said has changed that vision a little bit, but the linux comunity should focus in getting a proper and COMPLETE app that may capture 720×576 from a DV source, organize material, be able to reuse and multitrack editing, and deliver a DVD, in a comfortable, simple, and high quality tool/s, if linux comunity can get that OK we get to the 90´s level in video editing, THEN you move forward to bigger FORMATS, don´t you think?
A ferrari without weels, steerweels, or seats, is not even a CAR, so why we should still be worry about the engine running at 150kmph if we can already 80kmp/h and it´s fine for everyday use,Focus in the WEELS and the CONTROLS, because nobody will use it. Seems like I am describing cinelerra here, but actually Iam concerned about OME, It IS the best thing out there, tiny changes are needed and envolve USERS, not code.
FOCUS IN THE USER, because the USER will edit videos, if the program is faster or slower…who cares? should be USABE.
Best regards, keeep up the good work.
btw. If you are an Ubuntu developer, and want to improve Open Movie Editor on Ubuntu, please fix bugs from my Launchpad Buglist]]>